Despite the faults of today's national government, a global secular government would be dramatically worse. A secular world government is a non-religious, political body that would make, interpret, and enforce a set of laws internationally. The secular belief (and ultimately the belief of this ruling body) revolves around the fact that just as humans evolve, so should government. They claim that we, as human beings, are perfectable, and believe that a global government, unified in the secular belief system, would bring peace to this world. While all of this sounds ideal in the fact that the world would finally become unified, this belief forgets man's innate sinful nature. Because man is sinful, man's law is sinful. Following a sinful set of laws, put into place all over the world, we will not at all be able to "evolve" and create a world of perfection. To continue, a global secular government, not at all rooted in God is inevitably unethical in its practice. The Understanding the Times curriculum claims regarding this, that "to cut off law from its ethical sources is to strike a terrible blow at the rule of law." With a global secular government, there is clearly no ethical accountability. Coincidentally, many worldviews integrate the idea of an ideal government into their political beliefs. Marxists dream of the day when the proletariat will rise up and create the utopia of a classless society. Similarly, Cosmic Humanists work to reach a Collective Consciousness, through the "New World Order," which is their own ideal government. It is important to realize that however similar these religions may be in terms of political beliefs, they are really quite different.
Although a global secular government claims to create equality in the political system, it ultimately fails. A Secular Humanist government seeks to bring the world to order by changing human relationships. Furthermore, they seek to equalize people, getting rid of dominance and submissiveness, but they again forget to factor in man's sinful nature. Man simply cannot be equalized. As human beings we are prone to the idea of hierarchy, and crave leadership to guide us through life. Furthermore, a global secular government does little to create equality. Such government would ultimately oppress freedom of religion and eradicate the symbols of Christianity in an attempt to equalize every part of society. Government very much uses the "foot in the door policy," meaning that if it can control one area or aspect of society, it can ultimately control the others as well. Such a government would not only be dramatically overbearing, but it would take away the equality we can all experience now under a democracy which gives every citizen access to liberty through freedom of speech and religion to name a few.
One last fault of this government comes through the idea that because of the diversity of the world, unity cannot be an option. All around the world, people have different ideas regarding religion, values, morals, treatment of others, and priorities just to name a few. Another very important difference between the people of this world is the way in which they view government. Different cultures find different ways to implement government successfully, and a political system one country or culture may choose to use may not fit with another culture. The United States functions (arguably) very well under a democracy because of the "melting pot" of cultures in which it houses. However, as seen through the years of conflict with the Middle East, namely Iraq, a democracy would not work because of the Muslim religion, and the Shari'a law which they follow fervently. Despite the fact that we were all made in God's image, we are all different. Therefore, we must embrace these differences and work to create a government that works for our own, unique, individual culture. We must preserve these differences rather than forcibly conform to a global secular government which will in no way create peace in this broken world.
Monday, March 21, 2011
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Abortion (argument #2)
I would, for the most part, agree with this claim, however some of the time, under some circumstances, under some situations, this statement does not hold true. It is amazing how much media has picked up on this issues that seems to be rapidly growing. Movies and tv shows alike portray teen pregnancy as if it were really no big deal, but in reality, it can cause great strain on the part of the mother, as well as everyone around her.
I believe it to be true that teen moms are more likely to leave school more often. Becoming a mother takes a certain level of maturity, responsibility, and drive which most teenagers have not acquired yet. When the responsibility of a baby comes into the picture on top of schoolwork, sports, friends, family, and extracurricular activities, teen mothers often snap under the weight of what they must deal with. Caring for the baby (if they plan on keeping it) becomes the priority as it very may well take a toll on their life and health as well. As a result, a mother who cannot go to school cannot get a job and support her baby, especially if the teen does not have a supportive family, or if a father figure for the baby is not in place.
As to the second claim regarding prenatal care, I believe that this varies from situation to situation. Teen mothers who have an emotionally and financially supportive family will most often be able to be provided with adequate prenatal care, making for a better, safer pregnancy. On the other hand, teens living without emotionally and/or financially stabilizing families will most likely be unable to receive the support they need to make it through the long months of pregnancy. This also comes into play with the third claim: that teen mothers rely on public assistance. When teens are unable to find support for themselves and their babies at home, they have no choice but to turn to public assistance. However, a stable home life will more often than not reduce a teen's need of public assistance.
I do agree with the fourth claim, that teen moms are more likely to develop health problems, yet again it rather depends on a situation. A rape victim may not only have physical damage done to them, but the experience may spark emotional problems as well. In the worst case, these emotional problems may lead the young mother to decide to abort the baby. Unfortunately, right now we live in a world where this is a completely acceptable option, and many teens who believe they cannot handle the responsibility of caring for a baby, often turn to this. Of course, this may only increase their emotional problems. Pregnancy in teens especially, can cause a lack of acceptance on the part of society, family members, and even peers. As a result, a pregnant teen may become very depressed, and feel completely ostracized.
I believe that this last claim is quite true: teen moms are more likely to end up getting divorced. To begin, most teens become pregnant by a boyfriend rather than a husband, and although they many have some commitment to each other, it is usually not enough to last through something as stressful and committing as the birth and caring of a human being. High school dating for the most part isn't about finding who you want to marry, but finding out what kind of qualities you are attracted to. For this reason, and the lack of interest in relationship commitment as well as the large responsibility a baby brings into the picture, most teen moms find themselves divorced, alone, and having to care for their baby on their own.
In conclusion, I believe that overall the odds are stacked against teen moms. Depending on their own unique situation however, the level of their depravity can vary. However, it must be noted that our society is beginning to grow and change itself to align with issues like teen pregnancy. Online schooling allows teen moms to receive an education without sacrificing their health or their baby's. Furthermore, free pregnancy clinics, and various types of public assistance and non profit organizations work to ease the stress, both emotion and physical, that teen moms must go through. We must, as Christians, work to raise awareness of the issues that come with teen pregnancy and urge society to take a Biblical approach regarding this issue, showing society that chastity wipes clean all of these problems.
I believe it to be true that teen moms are more likely to leave school more often. Becoming a mother takes a certain level of maturity, responsibility, and drive which most teenagers have not acquired yet. When the responsibility of a baby comes into the picture on top of schoolwork, sports, friends, family, and extracurricular activities, teen mothers often snap under the weight of what they must deal with. Caring for the baby (if they plan on keeping it) becomes the priority as it very may well take a toll on their life and health as well. As a result, a mother who cannot go to school cannot get a job and support her baby, especially if the teen does not have a supportive family, or if a father figure for the baby is not in place.
As to the second claim regarding prenatal care, I believe that this varies from situation to situation. Teen mothers who have an emotionally and financially supportive family will most often be able to be provided with adequate prenatal care, making for a better, safer pregnancy. On the other hand, teens living without emotionally and/or financially stabilizing families will most likely be unable to receive the support they need to make it through the long months of pregnancy. This also comes into play with the third claim: that teen mothers rely on public assistance. When teens are unable to find support for themselves and their babies at home, they have no choice but to turn to public assistance. However, a stable home life will more often than not reduce a teen's need of public assistance.
I do agree with the fourth claim, that teen moms are more likely to develop health problems, yet again it rather depends on a situation. A rape victim may not only have physical damage done to them, but the experience may spark emotional problems as well. In the worst case, these emotional problems may lead the young mother to decide to abort the baby. Unfortunately, right now we live in a world where this is a completely acceptable option, and many teens who believe they cannot handle the responsibility of caring for a baby, often turn to this. Of course, this may only increase their emotional problems. Pregnancy in teens especially, can cause a lack of acceptance on the part of society, family members, and even peers. As a result, a pregnant teen may become very depressed, and feel completely ostracized.
I believe that this last claim is quite true: teen moms are more likely to end up getting divorced. To begin, most teens become pregnant by a boyfriend rather than a husband, and although they many have some commitment to each other, it is usually not enough to last through something as stressful and committing as the birth and caring of a human being. High school dating for the most part isn't about finding who you want to marry, but finding out what kind of qualities you are attracted to. For this reason, and the lack of interest in relationship commitment as well as the large responsibility a baby brings into the picture, most teen moms find themselves divorced, alone, and having to care for their baby on their own.
In conclusion, I believe that overall the odds are stacked against teen moms. Depending on their own unique situation however, the level of their depravity can vary. However, it must be noted that our society is beginning to grow and change itself to align with issues like teen pregnancy. Online schooling allows teen moms to receive an education without sacrificing their health or their baby's. Furthermore, free pregnancy clinics, and various types of public assistance and non profit organizations work to ease the stress, both emotion and physical, that teen moms must go through. We must, as Christians, work to raise awareness of the issues that come with teen pregnancy and urge society to take a Biblical approach regarding this issue, showing society that chastity wipes clean all of these problems.
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Law #4
Equality and justice are both widely used words in the business of law and most specifically, Critical Legal Studies. Critical Legal Studies seeks, in fact, to embrace equality and justice by overturning social norms that do not represent the nation in the way it should be represented. Additionally, CLS lawyers see great flaws in the liberal legal system that is held on a pedestal today, and embrace the theories of postmodernism instead, aiming to deconstruct the law in order to overturn the oppressors and the oppressed. Equality and justice, however similar they may seem, are slightly different in meaning and use. Equality works to create a sense of "equalness" in quality, rank, or degree, while justice focuses more on the judgement of people, and the administration of punishment or reward. In a perfect legal system, justice works to bring equality to the world-this is how these two terms coincide. Critical Legal Studies lawyers believe that they bring equality to the world by breaking down the hierarchy of law, but equality may not always be right in every situation. In regards to homosexual marriage or abortion, we as Christians know that God does not want His people to partake in these things, but Critical Legal Studies lawyers look at these issues, see that homosexuals, for instance, are feeling "oppressed" and seek to change this by bringing equality to marriage. Similarly, CLS lawyers approach justice radically, as they want to turn the tables of law and make sure that the oppressed are no longer in disparaging situations. However, they will often go to extremes to make sure this happens, and although they may try to break hierarchy in law, it ultimately cannot be broken.
As Christians, we have a large responsibility to "do justice," which the Bible speaks adamantly about. We are, in fact, called to not only fear the Lord, but remember that God shows no partiality to any of His people. Therefore, we are equal in His eyes and are all under the wing of God's defense. We are to recognize this and "do justice" by loving those who are not loved, and change not only the way we view other people, but how the rest of the world views them as well. God doesn't look at the homeless man on the street any differently than he does at you or me, and we must ingrain that into our memories if we are to ever successfully "do justice" in the world. Similarly, Jeremiah commands us to carry out justice in this world by doing what we know to be right, to rescue the oppressed, and not waste our lives doing what we know to be wrong. We need to carry out these things in such a way that we set an example for everyone else! Although Jeremiah commands us to rescue the oppressed, we must not confuse this with the Critical Legal Studies' view of deconstructing law. Yes, we must rescue and help the oppressed, but do it in such a way that we help to sooth the cycle of oppression--not by radically changing the legal system that God has put into place for man to carry out. Micah reminds us that we must remember that God has given us the steps to act justly, and in order to carry out His will of "doing justice" we must be mercy givers to others. Furthermore, as James says we must not only help those who can't help themselves, but we must also keep ourselves from being polluted by the world so that we can set an example for others, and stop the terrible cycle of oppression the right way!
As Christians, we have a large responsibility to "do justice," which the Bible speaks adamantly about. We are, in fact, called to not only fear the Lord, but remember that God shows no partiality to any of His people. Therefore, we are equal in His eyes and are all under the wing of God's defense. We are to recognize this and "do justice" by loving those who are not loved, and change not only the way we view other people, but how the rest of the world views them as well. God doesn't look at the homeless man on the street any differently than he does at you or me, and we must ingrain that into our memories if we are to ever successfully "do justice" in the world. Similarly, Jeremiah commands us to carry out justice in this world by doing what we know to be right, to rescue the oppressed, and not waste our lives doing what we know to be wrong. We need to carry out these things in such a way that we set an example for everyone else! Although Jeremiah commands us to rescue the oppressed, we must not confuse this with the Critical Legal Studies' view of deconstructing law. Yes, we must rescue and help the oppressed, but do it in such a way that we help to sooth the cycle of oppression--not by radically changing the legal system that God has put into place for man to carry out. Micah reminds us that we must remember that God has given us the steps to act justly, and in order to carry out His will of "doing justice" we must be mercy givers to others. Furthermore, as James says we must not only help those who can't help themselves, but we must also keep ourselves from being polluted by the world so that we can set an example for others, and stop the terrible cycle of oppression the right way!
Friday, February 25, 2011
Law #3 Post
It is true that there is much debate occurring today about the Shari'a law which Muslims hold to. In fact, the ways in which Christians and Muslims view the idea of law and approach law are very different. From a Christian standpoint, law is from God, our Creator, and this law shares the very nature of Him. We are accountable not only to God but to those laws as well, and we must follow His laws even when society chooses to go down another path. As Christians, we believe in what is called "natural law" in which God reveals His law and will through revelation. In turn, we can know God's will through our conscience, or our inherent sense of right and wrong.
Shari'a law, or the law that Muslim's hold to, is quite different from Biblical law. It governs every aspect of society from marriage to business to religion. While Christianity affirms that God reveals His will and Himself through the law, Shari'a law says that God has not revealed himself or his nature through law. Because of this, law becomes nothing more than a strict set of rules that must be followed without fail. This causes us to ponder the following question: why follow someone who not only are you not able to see, but you aren't even able to know their nature? Furthermore, while Christianity holds to God's law resolutely, Muslims believe that some passages in their Qur'an can overrule others--therefore, law becomes open to their own interpretation from situation to situation, removing any consistency. Despite the inconsistencies, Shari'a law is not only strict, but most certainly threatening at times. While Christianity finds great freedom within the Christian religion, Muslims cannot find that same individual freedom within their religion. In fact, the idea of freedom of expression is not a part of the Muslim legal tradition. Women and non Muslims especially feel none of the freedom in the Muslim religion that women can in Christianity. Furthermore, this is where Christianity is different: God sets boundaries through law so that we may bear His image respectfully, yet He allows us freedom at the same time. The Biblical worldview provides a law that respects at the same time the greatness and depravity of man, something that the Shari'a law cannot even try to accomplish!
Shari'a law, or the law that Muslim's hold to, is quite different from Biblical law. It governs every aspect of society from marriage to business to religion. While Christianity affirms that God reveals His will and Himself through the law, Shari'a law says that God has not revealed himself or his nature through law. Because of this, law becomes nothing more than a strict set of rules that must be followed without fail. This causes us to ponder the following question: why follow someone who not only are you not able to see, but you aren't even able to know their nature? Furthermore, while Christianity holds to God's law resolutely, Muslims believe that some passages in their Qur'an can overrule others--therefore, law becomes open to their own interpretation from situation to situation, removing any consistency. Despite the inconsistencies, Shari'a law is not only strict, but most certainly threatening at times. While Christianity finds great freedom within the Christian religion, Muslims cannot find that same individual freedom within their religion. In fact, the idea of freedom of expression is not a part of the Muslim legal tradition. Women and non Muslims especially feel none of the freedom in the Muslim religion that women can in Christianity. Furthermore, this is where Christianity is different: God sets boundaries through law so that we may bear His image respectfully, yet He allows us freedom at the same time. The Biblical worldview provides a law that respects at the same time the greatness and depravity of man, something that the Shari'a law cannot even try to accomplish!
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Law #2 post
You ask if laws are up to the determination and interpretation of each individual. First of all, it must be noted that there are two different kinds of laws: man's law and God's law. God has put our governmental system in place in order to ensure that our country remain safe and prosperous. However, man is sinful, and often man's laws will go against God's laws. Since the beginning of creation, God has structured rules in which we are to follow. Contrary to popular belief, God's laws are strict but they are not put into place to make life miserable! Instead, God has put these rules into place in order that we may be more like Him as we strive to be "lights" for God in this sinful world.
We are called to follow both man's law and God's law if they agree on a particular issue. However, partially laws are up to the interpretation of an individual. This is especially true from a Christian standpoint, because often laws that the government (or man) makes go against what God says. In this case, it is up to an individual to go against what the government says and follow God's law first and foremost, as this is one of the things he calls us to do. For instance, issues of abortion and homosexual marriage becoming legal are at the forefront of government discussion today. If laws regarding these topics do end up passing, we must be ready to go against these laws and follow God's laws instead, as He clearly commands us not to indulge in these practices.
On the other hand, laws are not up to the interpretation of individuals if both God's law and man's law rule the same about a certain issue. Both God's law and man's law, for instance, forbid the murder of human beings. If we choose to commit this crime, and interpret the law ourselves, we are going against not only man's law but God's law as well! God has put the government in place for our own safety and we must be prepared to follow the laws that the government sets out for us. Much controversy arises when a law is passed by the government yet God has not said anything on the topic. For instance, traffic laws: are we to follow them or not? When God gave Moses the Ten Commandments, there were no need for traffic laws! In this case, we must interpret that traffic laws are there for our safety, and God calls us to submit to the laws of our authority. Following them will not only set a good example for others, but ensure that we are safer in this sinful world.
Rules are both up for interpretation and not to a certain extent. We must realize that although we cannot see God, He is just as much there and governing over us as the government we can watch on CSPAN. We must remember, furthermore, that God is our creator and redeemer, and we must follow His laws even when the government chooses not to!
We are called to follow both man's law and God's law if they agree on a particular issue. However, partially laws are up to the interpretation of an individual. This is especially true from a Christian standpoint, because often laws that the government (or man) makes go against what God says. In this case, it is up to an individual to go against what the government says and follow God's law first and foremost, as this is one of the things he calls us to do. For instance, issues of abortion and homosexual marriage becoming legal are at the forefront of government discussion today. If laws regarding these topics do end up passing, we must be ready to go against these laws and follow God's laws instead, as He clearly commands us not to indulge in these practices.
On the other hand, laws are not up to the interpretation of individuals if both God's law and man's law rule the same about a certain issue. Both God's law and man's law, for instance, forbid the murder of human beings. If we choose to commit this crime, and interpret the law ourselves, we are going against not only man's law but God's law as well! God has put the government in place for our own safety and we must be prepared to follow the laws that the government sets out for us. Much controversy arises when a law is passed by the government yet God has not said anything on the topic. For instance, traffic laws: are we to follow them or not? When God gave Moses the Ten Commandments, there were no need for traffic laws! In this case, we must interpret that traffic laws are there for our safety, and God calls us to submit to the laws of our authority. Following them will not only set a good example for others, but ensure that we are safer in this sinful world.
Rules are both up for interpretation and not to a certain extent. We must realize that although we cannot see God, He is just as much there and governing over us as the government we can watch on CSPAN. We must remember, furthermore, that God is our creator and redeemer, and we must follow His laws even when the government chooses not to!
Monday, February 14, 2011
Law
You say that Sarah thinks that laws are created only by societies. As a secular humanist, her views of law are rightly this. Secular humanists believe in what is known as "positive law" in which man, or society, devises his own rules. For a secular humanist, law and rules bring order to their lives, yet they are subject to change. Positive law rotates on the fact that only humans know what is best for their society, so they clearly reject the idea of divine law, or the idea that God governs His people and has put into place a set of rules that we, as His people, must follow.
In answer to your question, governments are not the ultimate authority for creating laws. As Christians we believe in divine law, or natural law, which holds to the idea that God, our supreme creator, not only created the Heavens and the Earth, but law as well, and put the idea of law to use through the creation of absolute laws, or rules that we must follow. God laid out his plan for creation, and put rules into place from the very beginning. Adam and Eve, after breaking God's only rule, were banished from the garden because they went against God's set rules. We of course see this idea of rule breaking and punishment still alive today. After the Garden of Eden, God laid out a list of rules in the Ten Commandments that he gave to Moses to safeguard and teach to the people. It is easy to think of God as a strict parent that keeps us all on a tight leash, but in reality the laws that God makes mirror His nature. We can therefore be more like God if we choose to follow the rules that He has set out for us, and it is this that He wants us to do.
While it may seem that governments make the rules in our country, it is ultimately to God that we should be answering to. God of course wants us to respect the leaders that he has put into place to help govern us, but whenever something in the law contradicts God's word we should be prepared to go against the government to follow our Creator and ultimate law giver. God is the ultimate authority for the creation of laws as he created even the idea of law itself, and although government may try to persuade us differently, is it God to whom we answer in the end!
In answer to your question, governments are not the ultimate authority for creating laws. As Christians we believe in divine law, or natural law, which holds to the idea that God, our supreme creator, not only created the Heavens and the Earth, but law as well, and put the idea of law to use through the creation of absolute laws, or rules that we must follow. God laid out his plan for creation, and put rules into place from the very beginning. Adam and Eve, after breaking God's only rule, were banished from the garden because they went against God's set rules. We of course see this idea of rule breaking and punishment still alive today. After the Garden of Eden, God laid out a list of rules in the Ten Commandments that he gave to Moses to safeguard and teach to the people. It is easy to think of God as a strict parent that keeps us all on a tight leash, but in reality the laws that God makes mirror His nature. We can therefore be more like God if we choose to follow the rules that He has set out for us, and it is this that He wants us to do.
While it may seem that governments make the rules in our country, it is ultimately to God that we should be answering to. God of course wants us to respect the leaders that he has put into place to help govern us, but whenever something in the law contradicts God's word we should be prepared to go against the government to follow our Creator and ultimate law giver. God is the ultimate authority for the creation of laws as he created even the idea of law itself, and although government may try to persuade us differently, is it God to whom we answer in the end!
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
How Should Christians Respond to Feminism?
Christians should respond to feminism in a rather cautious way, yet still in a way that declares the truth. First of all, it must be noted that God created man and women to bear his image equally. Furthermore, not only were men and women created in God's image, but they were called to different tasks. This is often something feminists forget, focusing more in the lack of equality seen between gender today. God calls us to different roles, specific roles, and we must remember that God created each of us with a purpose, whether or not we know exactly what our purpose is. God did not create every person on this Earth to be employed in the same job, live in the same place, eat the same food, or drive the same cars! We were created to live in this world that He created, spreading His gospel as we strive to improve the world and our relationship with our creator despite the sin-infested world in which we live. We, as Christians, need to respond to feminism by making known these ideas: that God calls us not to be cookie cutter robots, but individuals with specified tasks. Feminists need to realize that God sees both genders that he has created as equal, and loves everything that he has made!
Christians must also bring to light the fact that women and men cannot find fulfillment in the same things. While women find fulfillment in relationships, men find ultimate fulfillment in a job, or career. God designed men and women differently, to carry out different purposes, and therefore no matter how hard radical feminists try, men and women cannot be exactly the same: we are not internally wired to be the same!
Throughout Genesis 2, God speaks of the creation of man, and the specific tasks that he has laid out for man to complete. While man is to be the "little king" or head of the household, women are meant to be the helpers, and completers of man. Each gender is therefore equally dependant on the other to complete the tasks that they were not internally wired to do. Despite what feminists claim, God does not say that men cannot care for the children and women cannot have a successful career. Rather, He brings to light the idea that men and women were created differently in regards to their responsibilities and what they may excel at, yet are equally made in God's great image. This is what Christians need to teach to the feminist community in order that they learn the truth about gender differences and how males and females can peacefully coexist in society.
Christians must also bring to light the fact that women and men cannot find fulfillment in the same things. While women find fulfillment in relationships, men find ultimate fulfillment in a job, or career. God designed men and women differently, to carry out different purposes, and therefore no matter how hard radical feminists try, men and women cannot be exactly the same: we are not internally wired to be the same!
Throughout Genesis 2, God speaks of the creation of man, and the specific tasks that he has laid out for man to complete. While man is to be the "little king" or head of the household, women are meant to be the helpers, and completers of man. Each gender is therefore equally dependant on the other to complete the tasks that they were not internally wired to do. Despite what feminists claim, God does not say that men cannot care for the children and women cannot have a successful career. Rather, He brings to light the idea that men and women were created differently in regards to their responsibilities and what they may excel at, yet are equally made in God's great image. This is what Christians need to teach to the feminist community in order that they learn the truth about gender differences and how males and females can peacefully coexist in society.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)